The debate over whether or not poker solvers are killing the game has been raging for years. Some people believe that the use of solvers is ruining the excitement and challenge of poker, while others maintain that they are simply an invaluable tool that can help players improve their game.
So, does solving really kill poker?
At first glance, it would seem that solving might indeed be a major factor in the game’s demise. After all, if players can figure out how to beat the odds and win consistently by using software, then why would anyone bother playing against other human opponents?
However, there are several factors that could counterbalance this argument. For one, poker is a complex game with a lot of strategic elements that still require human intuition and skill. Even if all of a player’s opponents were using solvers, it would still be possible for them to come up with strategies to defeat them.
Secondly, even if all of a player’s opponents were using solvers, it would still be possible for them to find new ways to improve their game by learning from their mistakes. And finally, even if solvers completely replaced human opponents in poker tournaments, it would still be possible for humans to compete by playing against each other online.
So while solving definitely has an impact on the game at least in some ways, it is far from being the sole reason why poker is declining in popularity. Instead, there are likely a variety of other factors at play including changing social trends, technological advancements andplayer habits.
