There is no definitive answer to this question as it depends on the specific allegations being made. However, in general, allegations that virtual poker is rigged can be broadly classified into two categories: those that suggest the game is deliberately biased in favor of certain players, and those that suggest the game is rigged in order to unfairly advantage certain hands.
The first type of allegation – that the game is biased in favor of certain players – is more difficult to prove. This type of rigging would involve manipulating the rules of the game in a way that benefits certain players over others.
However, it’s not clear how easy it would be to do this, and it would likely require a significant amount of effort – something that could easily fall into the hands of opponents who want to game rigged.
The second type of allegation – that the game is rigged in order to unfairly advantage certain hands – is more likely to be true. This type of rigging would involve manipulating the rules of the game in such a way as to give certain hands an unfair advantage.
For example, a player might be able to gain an unfair advantage by playing with a “bad” hand (one with low odds), or by playing at an inappropriate time (when other players are less likely to have good cards). Again, this type of rigging is easier to do than it seems and can easily lead to an unfair advantage for those who are willing to take advantage of it.
